Saturday, July 15, 2006

Unbelievable!

So if you are still among those skeptical of American media having a bias favoring Israel, the current situation should shed some light on this phenomena for you.

In the ongoing assault (4 days continous as of now) on Lebannon by Israel, more than 100 civilians have been killed by the Israeli army and two Israeli soliders have died in the conflict.
(Sources: 1 - 2).

It is appalling, more than usual, to see how the media in the States is covering the current situation. Presenting the two bare facts, judge for yourself.

1.
The most recent development is that of a bus being attacked by Israeli air strikes, killing 18 civilians, of which were nice children and the elderly. This alone is horrific, but not something new the Middle East, as Hamas has carried out such attacks on Israeli civilians in the past. When Hamas carries these attacks, the news of this hung as the headline spanning the globe, this is a known fact. Yet in this same exact case, the story is barely existent in the American media, as I type this, CNN.com, FOXNEWS.com, and MSNBC.com have not listed it in the main page anywhere. The story is not be found anywhere.

2. Story is presented differently w/o objectivity
(Objectivity = backbone of journalism)

Foreign Media
Israel Attacks Lebanese Bus, 18 Dead
http://www.zaman.com/?bl=hotnews&alt=&trh=20060715&hn=34810

Domestic Media (AP)
Israel
Pounds South Beirut, Killing 18
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2196057

Strike differences from our media and the worlds
AP: No mention of
civilians, 9 children, bus, or attack/air strike ("pounds")

- - - - -
Some developing news worth noting:
US has a lengthy history of vetoing UN resolutions condemning Israel, may that be in reference to excessive force, illegal settlements, human rights violations, etc. So this should come as no surprise, 'US vetoes UN resolution condemning Israel' -Indian Express. After vetoing a UN resolution condemning Israel pull out of Gaza (maybe you forgot there is a second offensive there "Operation Summer Rain"), there is more of our blind strategy.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Zidane treated outrageously: Gosper


International Olympic Committee members, described Zidane's straight red card as "outrageous" as it failed to consider Materazzi's role in the incident.
Kevan Gosper, one of Australia's top Olympic officials, has hit out at soccer's world governing body FIFA over Zinedine Zidane's dismissal in the World Cup final for failing to take into account the effect of verbal abuse.

The France captain was sent off for headbutting Marco Materazzi in the chest after the Italian defender allegedly repeatedly insulted his mother and sister.

Zidane spoke on French television on Wednesday about the hurtful nature of the comments and while he would not elaborate on the exact words, he said he would have preferred "to have been punched in the face".

Gosper, one of Australia's senior International Olympic Committee members, described Zidane's straight red card as "outrageous" as it failed to consider Materazzi's role in the incident.

With the incident now under investigation by FIFA, Gosper said the organisation had the opportunity to crack down on the blight of sledging in sport.

"The outrageous on-field treatment of Zinedine Zidane offers the FIFA Disciplinary Review Panel an opportunity to send a message to the sporting world that verbal abuse can be more wounding than physical attack and will not be tolerated," Gosper said in a statement on Thursday.

Gosper called on FIFA to acknowledge the psychological effect sledging can have upon sportsmen and to treat it as seriously as any physical abuse during matches.

"Without a public appreciation by FIFA of the long-term impact on Zidane, he will carry forever the burden of a verbal abuse every bit as wounding as a physical attack," Gosper said.

"The referee got it wrong when he failed to establish the reason for Zidane acting as he did before abandoning him to the Hall of Infamy."

France went on to lose the World Cup final to Italy 5-3 on penalties, following Zidane's dismissal with 10 minutes to play in extra-time and the score level at 1-1.

Source: The West Australian
http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=15&ContentID=1054

The arrogance of power

By Stavros Lygeros

The developments we have witnessed in Gaza and Lebanon over the past few days merely serve to confirm, in the most dramatic fashion, that the maxim “might is right” still applies. It has become quite clear that Israel is much more than a small state armed to the teeth. Not even the US enjoys such tolerance.

The governments of the West and those who shape its public opinion are, as a rule, extremely cautious in their criticism of Tel Aviv. Evidently this is not merely due to the legacy of the Holocaust. It is also attributable to the creation of an entire industry of ideological terrorism and to the exploitation of the Holocaust for political ends, which insults the memory of the victims.

It is hardly irrelevant that the media refer to Israeli soldiers being “abducted” rather than “taken captive” - the term “abduction” suggests terrorism while soldiers are “taken captive” after armed conflicts. However, both captures, of two Israeli soldiers in Lebanon and another in Gaza earlier this month, followed armed conflict. Generally Israel describes such conflicts as terrorist acts. But this time it referred to the unjustified attack of one sovereign state against another. Tel Aviv does not regard Hezbollah as less of a terrorist organization than Hamas. It just needed a political excuse for its attack on Lebanon.

The attacks on Gaza and Lebanon were not carried out to free the three Israeli soldiers, nor because of Israel’s penchant for multiple reprisals. There is also an acute problem with rocket attacks targeting Israeli settlements. But these attacks are just the flipside of Israel’s offensives in this unbalanced war.

Israel’s mistake is not that it is exercising its right to defend itself but that it has been carried away by an arrogance of power that has extinguished any political farsightedness. Hence its attempt to impose a military solution upon a political problem.

Source: Kathimerni
http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_columns_100024_14/07/2006_72063

_________

Related: U.S. vetoes U.N. resolution on Mideast
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/13/mideast.response/index.html

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Paralyzed man moves computer cursor through thought

By Patricia Reaney Wed Jul 12, 1:46 PM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - A Paralyzed man using a new brain sensor has been able to move a computer cursor, open e-mail and control a robotic device simply by thinking about doing it, a team of scientists said on Wednesday.

They believe the BrainGate sensor, which involves implanting electrodes in the brain, could offer new hope to people Paralyzed by injuries or illnesses.

"This is the first step in an ongoing clinical trial of a device that is encouraging for its potential to help people with paralysis," Dr Leigh Hochberg, of Massachusetts General Hospital, said in an interview.

The 25-year-old man who suffered paralysis of all four limbs three years earlier completed tasks such moving a cursor on a screen and controlling a robotic arm.

He is the first of four patients with spinal cord injuries, muscular dystrophy, stroke or motor neurone disease testing the brain-to-movement system developed by Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems Inc in Massachusetts.

"This is the dawn of major neurotechnology where the ability to take signals out of the brain has taken a big step forward. We have the ability to put signals into the brain but getting signals out is a real challenge. I think this represents a landmark event," said Professor John Donoghue of Brown University in Rhode Island and the chief scientific officer of Cyberkinetics.

The scientists implanted a tiny silicon chip with 100 electrodes into an area of the brain responsible for movement. The activity of the cells was recorded and sent to a computer which translated the commands and enabled the patient to move and control the external device.

"This part of the brain, the motor cortex, which usually sends its signals down the spinal cord and out to the limbs to control movement, can still be used by this participant to control an external device, even after years had gone by since his spinal cord injury," added Hochberg, a co-author of the study published in the journal Nature.

Although it is not the first time brain activity has been used to control a cursor, Stephen Scott of Queen's University in Ontario, Canada said it advances the technology.

"This research suggests that implanted prosthetics are a viable approach for assisting severely impaired individuals to communicate and interact with the environment," he said in a commentary in the journal.

In a separate study, researchers from Stanford University Schools of Medicine and Engineering described a faster way to process signals from the brain to control a computer or prosthetic device.

"Our research is starting to show that, from a performance perspective, this type of prosthetic system is clinically viable," Stephen Ryu, an assistant professor of neurosurgery at Stanford, said in a statement.

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/science_brain_dc...

Bollywood star hails Mumbai resilience

By Aamir Khan
Bollywood actor

Amir Khan
Khan was anxious about his office staff who commute by train
I was in Satara when I heard about the blasts.

I was shocked and immediately tried to get in touch with Mumbai, but just could not get through - all the lines were blocked.

There was no TV there, so I could not get a sense of what was happening. But my disbelief at the sudden attack and the loss of so many innocent lives is extreme.

I was anxious about the hundreds of thousands of people travelling by trains in peak hours.

I was also concerned about my own office staff, and wanted to know whether they had reached home - but just could not find out.

Then mercifully my chartered accountant called me and I got some information from him.

It is sad, it is appalling and the way people are going out of their way to help is just like the generous Mumbaiite.

'Stabbing the innocent'

The police are doing a good job, they are very capable.

If it seems otherwise, if people feel impatient, we must remind ourselves that the police force and the army are used to dealing with crime on a daily basis and they know what is the best step to take in such a situation.

We must follow the leaders at this time. And trust them. They require our co-operation at this time.

This horrifying act shows the extreme level of cowardice that makes people place bombs in trains and kill totally unaware people.

What can be more cowardly than something like this, which smacks of stabbing someone who is totally innocent.

What was the point of killing ordinary people?

I am glad that we have bounced back and are back at work - it just shows these people that we will not be cowed down by such stealthy, cowardly actions.

I think the best we can do is stick together and be alert.

'Taken unawares'

In fact it is important that we stick together and help the authorities in whichever way we can.

If we have any information that may help them, we should give them that.

It was and is an extremely tough situation for anyone to handle and we can only comment from the sidelines but in actuality we ourselves might not know how to go about handling such an unexpected and horrible situation.

But this is not only the case in India, it also happened in the UK and in the US. They too were taken unawares.

It is very tragic when we look at the result. So many lives lost, so much tragedy in so many families. My heart goes out to them all.

We must mourn the loss of innocent lives and condemn the extremely reprehensible action of the terrorist whose cowardice is seen so blatantly.

These people have little value for life. What sense does it make to kill someone when you do not even know who you are killing?

It is absolutely a senseless act.

Source: BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5175824.stm

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Mongolians mark 800th anniversary of Khan

By CHARLES HUTZLER, Associated Press WriterTue Jul 11, 4:30 PM ET

Mongolians celebrated the 800th anniversary of Genghis Khan's march to world conquest on Tuesday with festivities that mixed commercialism with appeals to nationalism.

In the capital's Central Stadium, men dressed like warriors in Genghis Khan's 13th-century horde paraded on stout, brown horses. In one section of the grandstands, people held up cards to form pictures of the conqueror and the national flag. An actor played Genghis Khan in white robe and head gear, riding a white horse to "Hurrays!" from the crowd.

"We Mongolians must be united and have one goal: to develop our country. Remember Genghis Khan and his great deeds," said President Nambaryn Enkhbayar, who usually wears a suit but was dressed in a traditional gold and cream silk robe for the occasion.

Mongolians and their leaders are reveling in Genghis Khan, finding a source of identity at an unsettling time.

Sandwiched between a voracious China and an assertive Russia, Mongolia faces challenges abroad, while at home the democracy and free markets that followed communism's collapse in 1990 have created wealth for some but left a third of the 2.8 million people in poverty.

The greatness of Genghis Khan is something that most Mongolians agree on.

"I feel so proud to have been born in the land of the Great Khan who conquered most of the world," said Tserendulam, a recently retired cook who was among 800 singers at the ceremony. Like many Mongolians, he uses one name.

The anniversary marks Genghis Khan's unification of fractious Mongol tribes in 1206 — an event that gave Mongolians a nascent national identity and set them on a course to forge an empire that stretched from the Pacific to Central Europe.

Though the celebrations will last a year, Tuesday's ceremony was timed for maximum public impact: the start of an annual festival of horse racing, archery, wrestling and camaraderie known as Naadam.

It's a time when the harsh weather of the steppe mellows for a brief summer, Mongolians enjoy themselves and politicians try to burnish their appeal.

Images of Genghis Khan, often as a wizened elder, have been plastered on billboards, etched in white stones on a mountainside and used to promote tourism. A rock opera of the conqueror's life — modeled on "Jesus Christ Superstar" — is being staged by a popular band.

The government tore down mausoleums of a 20th-century nationalist hero and a communist dictator on Ulan Bator's central square this year to build a $5 million monument of Genghis Khan in bronze.

At Tuesday's ceremony, the president and audience sang a newly altered version of the national anthem. The revisions, made by the government in recent weeks, deleted references to the communist past and replaced them with allusions to Mongolian independence.

In the rush to capitalize on his name, Genghis Khan's legacy as a brutal conqueror is being played down. Instead, he's being cast as an agent of world change, a visionary statesman who promoted low taxes on trade, diplomatic immunity and religious tolerance.

"We are forefathers of globalization," says one government slogan.

This marshaling of Genghis Khan's legacy to promote national pride — and the money being spent — has prompted cries of waste and political manipulation from some in the elite.

Mongolian politics has grown divisive, with partisan bickering between Enkhbayar's Mongolian People's First Party, a successor to the old Communist Party, and a coalition of newer democratic parties.

The president's "entourage is trying to create an image that by rallying around our leader we are recreating the glory of Mongolia in the 13th century," said Munkh-Ochir Dorjjugder, an international affairs expert at a Defense Ministry think tank.

Enkhbayar, in his speech, appealed several times for unity. He and members of his political circle defended their use of Genghis Khan's image as necessary given the challenges.

"As a small country sandwiched between large nations, globalization is felt day to day and it's a pressing matter," Tsend Munkh-Orgil, a member of Mongolia's parliament and Enkhbayar's party, told reporters Monday. He said Genghis Khan can help forge "the national unity and national consensus" missing since democracy and capitalism emerged 15 years ago.

"Our ancestor 800 years ago not only brought war and destruction, but he also brought liberation and freedom," said Munkh-Orgil, who has a degree from Harvard Law School. "As to the methods, it was the 13th century. What could we say?"

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060711/ap_on_re_as/mongolia_genghis_fever_lh1

Monday, July 10, 2006

India's test launch of new missile fails

By GAVIN RABINOWITZ, Associated Press Writer2 hours, 24 minutes ago

India's first test-firing of a new missile designed to carry nuclear warheads across much of Asia and the Middle East was unsuccessful, the defense minister said. Although initially reported as a success by officials, the Agni III missile plunged into the Bay of Bengal short of its target, Defense Pranab Mukherjee told reporters late Sunday.

Following the failed missile launch, an Indian rocket carrying a satellite for TV broadcasts veered off course and exploded after takeoff Monday, Indian media reported.

The missile launch came as President Bush tries to push a civilian nuclear deal with India past a skeptical Congress. The deal permits India to keep making nuclear weapons, and critics say the pact could undermine the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

Even though the deal does not cover missiles, the Hindu newspaper reported Monday that the top U.S. general, Peter Pace, gave Indian officials the green light to conduct the test when he visited India last month. The missile test reportedly had been delayed for two years by technical issues and fears of international condemnation.

Mukherjee, who witnessed Sunday's missile launch, said India would press ahead with the Agni III program. He termed the failure a snag, but offered no other details.

Indian media reported that the missile's second stage failed to separate after it was launched from Wheeler Island off the eastern state of Orissa.

India's current crop of missiles have been largely intended to confront archrival and neighbor Pakistan. The Agni III, by contrast, is to be India's longest-range missile, designed to reach 1,900 miles. That would putting China's major cities well into range, as well as targets deep in the Middle East.

It's also said to be capable of carrying a 200-300 kiloton nuclear warhead.

"This is going to help in establishing the credibility of India's deterrent profile," said Indian defense analyst C. Uday Bhaskar.

Still, he dismissed speculation the missile was designed with China in mind.

"Any strategic capability is not aimed at any particular nation. To say it is China-specific is misleading," Bhaskar said.

India and China have shared decades of mutual suspicion and fought a 1962 border war. But relations have warmed considerably in recent years as the two Asian giants have boosted trade and economic ties.

India's missile program, together with its nuclear program and drive for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council, is part of its ongoing efforts to establish itself as a world power.

While past Indian missile test firings were seen attempts at saber-rattling with Pakistan, which would in turn test its own missiles, the Agni III test was seen as routine and intended to further India's missile program, which aims to eventually produce a long-range ICBM.

India's homegrown missile arsenal already includes the short-range Prithvi ballistic missile, the medium-range Akash, the anti-tank Nag and the supersonic Brahmos missile, developed jointly with Russia.

India notified Pakistan ahead of the launch, in accordance with an agreement between the two, said Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam. India and Pakistan have fought three wars since they gained independence from Britain in 1947.

After Monday's rocket veered off course, authorities alerted emergency crews around the launch site in southeastern India, presumably in case the debris crashed back to earth, NDTV news television station reported.

The nearly 4,800-pound satellite — named INSAT-4C — was to be India's 12th satellite in orbit.

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060710/ap_on_re_as/india_missile_test...

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Gaza death toll mounts as Israel rejects ceasefire

Press Trust of India
Gaza City, July 9, 2006

Three Palestinian family members, including a six-year-old girl, were killed on Sunday in an air strike in Gaza City as Israel rejected a call by Hamas premier Ismail Haniya for a mutual ceasefire.

The girl, her elder brother and her mother were killed in the air raid which according to an army spokesman targeted a group of militants east of Gaza City.

Despite initial denials, the Israeli army later confirmed carrying out an airstrike in the neighbourhood of Sejayun.

"We are currently examining the exact details of the strike," an army source said.

Four more Palestinians were killed earlier as Israeli forces shifted the focus of their Gaza campaign to end militant rocket fire and free a captured soldier to the seaside strip's eastern frontier.

As Israel pushed on into Gaza, officials brushed aside Haniya's call for a "return to a situation of calm on the basis of a halt to all military operations by both sides".

"We do not hold negotiations with terrorists. They must first return the kidnapped soldier unharmed and cease their fire," an official in Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office told reporters.

"We will decide on our next moves according to the steps taken by the Palestinian government," he said, asking not to be named.

Haniya stressed that his Hamas government was determined to solve the problem through diplomatic channels in a "peaceful" manner.

Source: Hindustan Times
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1739490,00050004.htm
__
Gaza feud stokes bigger fire

By Betsy Hiel
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Sunday, July 9, 2006

The latest Israeli-Palestinian violence is diverting Arab anger from U.S. policy in Iraq to that old standby, U.S. support for Israel.

The fighting poses problems for another U.S. ally in the region -- Egypt -- and has prompted muted criticism of other Arab governments for ignoring the Palestinians.

Yet one American analyst is surprised the conflict hasn't provoked more concern about larger, longer-term consequences.

Jon Alterman, who directs the Middle East program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, believes that Israel's incursion aims to collapse Hamas and that the Bush administration is "basically sympathetic with Israeli goals."


Without a negotiated end, he predicts "things are likely to get worse."

Israel's incursion into the Palestinian-controlled Gaza Strip has dominated Middle Eastern newspapers and televisions for nearly two weeks. Arab commentators generally accuse the Bush administration of endorsing an attack that has killed scores of Palestinians, as well as a number of Israeli soldiers.

"It doesn't work, this American connection with Israeli interests," Walid Shaqir wrote in the pan-Arabic daily Al Hayat. "It contributes to the rising hatred against Washington in the region."

Although the incursion initially aimed to rescue a captured Israeli soldier, many Israelis hope it ends frequent rocket attacks by Palestinian militants.

Many Arabs suspect the real goal is to destabilize the Palestinians' newly elected Hamas government, reviled in Israel for its suicide attacks on Israeli civilians.

"Half the Palestinian cabinet and many parliamentarians are in Israel's hands," wrote Salama A. Salama in an editorial in Egypt's Al Ahram Weekly. "President Mahmoud Abbas is trapped and Gaza is being pummeled, all because one Israeli soldier has been abducted in retaliation for the killing of an entire Palestinian family on a Gaza beach" in an earlier Israeli bombardment.

Even some in Israel's lively press criticize the incursion. "The original goal, to return the kidnapped soldier ... was overlaid by the desire to change the rules of the game in the south (read: to stop the firing of Qassam rockets) and then by the intention to weaken the Hamas government," wrote Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff in the liberal Ha'aretz newspaper.

The operation, they conclude, "tried to achieve too many goals and may end without any of them being achieved."

Egyptian officials fear the fighting will destabilize their borders with Israel and Gaza. But an even greater concern may be that public support for Hamas will encourage more sympathy for the Muslim Brotherhood, the increasingly popular Islamic party that is challenging the two-decade-long rule of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

Mubarak has sent a delegation to negotiate for the Israeli soldier's release.

The Jordan Times has warned of an unfolding humanitarian disaster among Gaza's 1.3 million residents: "Sonic booms shatter people's sleep at night, lack of electricity plunges large parts of the strip in darkness ... hospitals and other essential services are functioning at emergency capacity only."

Despite the anger on the Arab street, however, Arab governments -- particularly those in Persian Gulf countries getting rich on $75-a-barrel oil -- are unlikely to impose a retaliatory oil embargo. That prospect prompts Salama, the Egyptian editorial writer, to complain that "Palestinians must be aware by now that they can no longer count on Arab help, economically, politically or militarily."

Alterman, of the international studies center, is "struck by how little strategic thinking is going on by anybody. I don't think people have really figured out what they want the end state to be. I don't see a deal that meets any side's ambition ... anyone engaging in the near future," particularly when Western-Muslim relations are so explosive.

"We have had the Palestinian Authority for some time now," he says, "and we may be moving to a point where there isn't a Palestinian Authority -- and what does that look like?"

In other words, if Hamas does fall, anarchy could rise in its place.

Source: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/middleeastreports/s_461195.html