Tuesday, May 09, 2006

India struggles with discrimination

Posted 5/7/2006 11:11 PM ET
NEW DELHI — Born into the lowest caste in Indian society, Pradeep Kumar Jatav holds a coveted job as a university lecturer.

Despite a strong academic record, the 31-year-old graduate student said he wouldn't have gotten the post without government-mandated quotas. "People don't want that you sit with them," he said. "At the moment they know your caste, they create barriers."

India still struggles with vestiges of an ancient and discriminatory caste system, even as it emerges as a potential 21st-century economic power.

The system, which dates back more than 2,000 years, divides the population into higher castes, which include priests and warriors, and lower castes, such as laborers. At the bottom sit the "untouchables," known as Dalits.

A recent government push to expand college admission and job quotas — an Indian form of affirmative action for the lower castes — has run into stiff opposition. Students have taken to the streets of New Delhi several times to protest the plan.

The clash pits the winners in India's ongoing economic boom against those who have been left behind.

While a burgeoning middle class snaps up automobiles and the latest appliances, 327 million Indians — about 30% of the population — still live in poverty on less than $1 a day, according to the Asian Development Bank.

Some low-caste families have risen to the middle class, thanks in part to quotas, but most remain poor, said Nandu Ram, a professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi and author of several books on India's lowest castes.

India sets aside 22.5% of its government jobs for the lowest castes, and an additional 27% for what are called the other "backward" castes, the next step up in the caste system.

'Divide in society' evident

The debate over quotas was intensified by the government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, which was elected in 2004 on a promise of spreading the fruits of economic growth to the poor.

Singh wants to introduce job quotas at private companies and expand quotas for college admission.

The uproar over quotas is "the sharpest expression of the divide in society between the classes," human rights lawyer Colin Gonsalves said.

Students worry that higher quotas will make the competition for limited slots even tougher.

The All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi, for example, has only 50 slots a year for graduate students, 11 of which are reserved for the lowest castes.

Donning white lab coats, undergraduates who expect to be competing for those spots marched in New Delhi last week to protest any quota increase.

Gonsalves remained unmoved. "These are elitist institutions," he said of the universities, "that need to be beaten on the head."

The anti-quota camp accuses the government of advocating quotas to seek votes from the lower castes. The backward castes make up about two-thirds of the population.

A better solution would be to ensure that the lower castes have better access to education, quota opponents say, something they blame the government for failing to provide. "The government can't provide primary and secondary education," said Peeyush Kumar, 20, a student who has protested the quotas. "That's why they are imposing this (quota), to increase the number of votes they are going to receive."

Business and academic leaders also warn that quotas could erode India's competitive advantages in a global economy.

"The only way we can compete with global players is by hiring best-in-class people from India and the rest of the world," said Azim Premji, chairman of software outsourcing giant Wipro. "We are an organization that requires selecting people on merit."

Freedom from humiliation

Blatant caste discrimination is on the wane in big cities but persists in rural communities, where Dalits must live apart from others and take water from separate taps.

In extreme cases, Dalits who violate caste codes are beaten and their houses destroyed.

Some offending women have been stripped naked and paraded around as a humiliating lesson to others, according to the New Delhi-based National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights.

As a young village schoolteacher, Hansraj Dugal would bring sweets to share with his colleagues at tea time. They remained uneaten. Not one of the other teachers would "pollute" themselves by touching the sweets of an untouchable, he said.

That kind of treatment drove Dugal, 45, to leave the village for the relative anonymity of New Delhi.

He changed the last name of his children to try to conceal their low-caste background.

Proudly describing their school honors, he hopes they can get through life without the benefit of quotas.

"I want to save my children from such discrimination," Dugal said.

Source: USA Today
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-05-07-caste-barriers_x.htm?csp=34

Razing of Mosque in India Brings Violence, Court Ban

NEW DELHI, May 4 — The Supreme Court ordered Gujarat on Thursday to stop demolishing buildings that the state says were constructed illegally. Six people died and dozens were injured this week during protests against the demolition of a Muslim shrine in Gujarat.

More than a thousand Indian Army troops were dispatched to Gujarat on Wednesday to contain further Hindu-Muslim violence.

The riots were set off by the demolition of the Syed Rashiduddin shrine in Vadodara, part of the state's effort to tear down buildings that it said had been built illegally. Several other houses of worship, including about a dozen small roadside Hindu temples, have also been torn down. But the demolition of the Muslim shrine — a larger and older structure used by Chishti, a mystical Sufi sect, which stood in the middle of a road — has become a touchstone of tension.

The court order was in response to a petition by the central government, which cited the violence and said the demolitions had been authorized without proper review.

Vadodara, also known as Baroda, remained under a curfew and was largely calm on Thursday. But Reuters quoted police officials as saying that three factories had been set on fire, and that mobs had pelted each other with stones. Army troops fanned out across the city, along with the local police.

Of the six people who died in three days of rioting, four were Muslims and two Hindu. One of the dead was Mohammed Rafik Vohra, the owner of a transport company, who was pulled out of his car by a Hindu mob and stabbed to death on Tuesday night, his brother, Mahmood, said.

The latest violence recalled Gujarat's ugly past and drew fresh scrutiny of its chief minister, Narendra Modi, of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. Four years ago, also during Mr. Modi's tenure in Gujarat, a prosperous and highly industrialized state, a train fire that killed 59 Hindu pilgrims set off reprisal attacks that left more than 1,100 dead, most of them Muslims.

Those on the train had been returning from a mission to build a temple in Ayodhya, on the site of a mosque whose destruction by fervent Hindus in 1992 set off riots that killed more than a thousand.

The police were accused of doing little to contain the anti-Muslim violence four years ago, and even less to see that wrongdoers were punished.

"The Gujarat government must be vigilant against extremist violence against helpless civilians," Brad Adams, Asia director of Human Rights Watch, said in a statement. "Instead of allowing this violence to deepen religious hatred, the authorities should launch an immediate, thorough and transparent investigation to ensure that those responsible are prosecuted and punished."

Several Muslim residents of Vadodara said this week's violence, and the delayed and biased response by the police, left them unconvinced that they would be protected.

M. I. Pathan, 60, a retired Gujarat policeman and a Muslim, said he called the police control room repeatedly on Tuesday night as a mob encircled his neighborhood looting houses and beating up anyone in sight. The police never came.

"We were really scared and praying for our lives," Mr. Pathan said in a telephone interview. "At one stage an operator in the police control room said: 'We do not have any police. You bring police from Pakistan.' I asked for his name but he did not tell me."

Source: New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/05/world/asia/05india.html

Monday, May 08, 2006

A Timeline of Relations Between Iran, U.S.

By The Associated Press
Mon May 8, 4:39 PM ET

Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who came to power in 1941, Iran was a close ally of the United States. Since the shah was toppled in the 1979 Iranian revolution, the two countries have been bitter enemies. Following is a chronology of their relations:

• April 1951: Mohammed Mossadegh is elected prime minister and nationalizes oil interests. In June 1953, the Eisenhower administration approves a British proposal for a joint Anglo-American operation, code-named Operation Ajax, to overthrow Mossadegh. His toppling becomes a long-standing source of resentment among Iranians toward the U.S.

• 1970: Iran signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

• February 1979: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini leads a revolution that ousts the shah and creates the Islamic Republic of Iran. In October, President Jimmy Carter allows the exiled shah into the U.S. for medical treatment.

• Nov. 4, 1979: Iranian students occupy the U.S. embassy. Fifty-two American hostages are held for 444 days in response to Carter's refusal to send the shah back to Iran for trial.

• April 24, 1980: An attempt by U.S. commandos to free hostages ends in failure when helicopter crashes into C-130 transport plane in Iranian desert, killing eight American servicemen.

• July 27, 1980: The shah dies of cancer in Egypt.

• January 1981: Iran releases the American hostages.

• 1986: United States sells arms to Iran in secret deal aimed at helping win release of American hostages held by Shiite militias in Lebanon.

• July 3, 1988: The USS Vincennes in the Gulf mistakenly shoots down an Iranian commercial jet, killing 290 passengers and crew.

• June 3, 1989: Ayatollah Khomeini dies just four months after issuing a fatwa, or religious ruling, ordering Muslims to kill British author Salman Rushdie because of his book The Satanic Verses, judged blasphemous to Islam.

• 1995: U.S. imposes oil and trade sanctions on Iran, saying it sponsors terrorism, is seeking to acquire nuclear weapons and is hostile to the Mideast peace process.

• May 1997: Pro-reform cleric Mohammad Khatami wins presidential elections on platform of easing social restrictions and improving ties with West, including United States. Khatami is re-elected in June 2001 but faces mounting pressure from conservatives.

• January 2002: In his State of the Union address, President Bush describes Iran, Iraq and North Korea as "the axis of evil."

• September 2004: Secretary of State Colin Powell says Iran's nuclear program is a growing threat and calls for international sanctions.

• June 2005: Hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is elected president, sealing downfall of reform movement, vows to continue nuclear program, insisting it is peaceful.

• April 2006: Iran announces it has successfully enriched uranium on small scale.

• May 2006: Britain and France, backed by United States, propose Security Council resolution demanding Iran abandon uranium enrichment or face the threat of unspecified further measures, a possible reference to sanctions.

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2630&ncid=2630&e=12&u=/ap/20060508/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_us_key_moments_1

Oil falls over $1 on Iran letter to Bush

Mon May 8, 9:38 AM ET

Oil fell over $1 on Monday on hopes tension over Iran's nuclear ambition will ease after Tehran made an unprecedented move to contact Washington.

U.S. light crude for June delivery was down $1.10 to $69.10 a barrel by 1330 GMT. London Brent crude fell $1.06 to $69.89 a barrel.

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has written to President Bush, Iranian government spokesman Gholamhossein Elham said.

"In this letter, he has given an analysis of the current world situation, of the root of existing problems and of new ways of getting out of the current vulnerable situation in the world," he said.

The letter is the first publicly announced personal communication from an Iranian Premier to a U.S. President since ties between the two countries were broken after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

The United States has led international action against Iran's nuclear plan, which it says is aimed at building atomic weapons.

Iran says it needs nuclear fuel for civilian use. It has reacted defiantly to the possibility of any U.N. resolution demanding it halt its nuclear program. At the weekend, it reissued a threat to leave the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Analysts were cautious over impact of the letter.

"The news from Iran is certainly bearish, at least immediately anyway. But the extent of how bearish it is going to be depends on the content of the letter, which no one knows as yet," said Tetsu Emori, the chief commodities strategist at Mitsui Bussan Futures.

The price of oil has risen over $8 to date this year as investors worry the Iran dispute may eventually lead to disruption to oil output from OPEC's second largest producer.

But the oil price has fallen $5 from record highs touched two weeks ago after concerns about U.S. gasoline supplies eased last week when motor fuel inventories rose.

BULLISH OUTLOOK

International Energy Agency director Claude Mandil said on Monday he expected oil prices to stay high for at least two to three years because of high global demand and tight supply.

"They (oil companies) have not invested enough for the last 20 years," Mandil said.

"This is a cyclical business. We had low prices in the 1990s, which was unfortunate for investment in future production. We now have accelerating investment, but that will not (see) results overnight," he told reporters in Australia.

Venezuela -- the world's fifth-largest oil exporter -- said it was seeking to boost royalties and income tax on four heavy oil projects that process some 620,000 barrels per day in the Orinoco Belt.

The announcement came less than a week after Bolivia rattled markets by sending troops into oil and gas fields in a surprise nationalization of the country's energy sector.

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060508/bs_nm/markets_oil_dc

Fighting U.S. might with oil

5/6/2006 5:00:00 PM GMT

Despite numerous assurances by U.S. intelligence sources that Iran needs another 10 years before having nuclear weapons, media reports over the past couple of months all suggested that the U.S. is planning or actually finalizing plans to strike Iran.

On top of those reports was Seymour Hersh’s last month article on The New Yorker, in which he asserted that the U.S. government is planning to massively bomb Iran, as well as using nuclear bunker-busting bombs to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities and development sites.

An editorial published Saturday on Bloomberg’s website suggested that Iran could be readying plans to respond to a possible U.S. strike targeting its nuclear installations by using its strong position in world's oil markets.

“They will not allow us to limit the conflict to `tit for tat' -- us hitting their nuclear facilities, and they restricted to hitting deployed American military,'' Michael Eisenstadt, an Iran expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former Central Command analyst said in an interview.

In case the U.S. decides to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities to force it suspend its nuclear program, Tehran might consider choking off oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, and thus trigger a market disruption that would force America to back off.

However the Iranians hope that current escalation over the Islamic republic’s nuclear activities doesn’t end up with nuclear confrontation, for the devastation such war could bring to both nations, the U.S., Iran, as well as neighbouring states.

It’s noteworthy that about one-fifth of the world's oil consumption, 17 mln barrels, is shipped through the strait every day.

But using the oil rich country’s influence over oil markets would be just a part of a broader retaliation plan that would also include attacks against U.S. military bases and interests in Iraq and worldwide, the analyst added.

In a written statement to the House Armed Services Committee on March 15, top U.S. commander in the Middle East, General John Abizaid warned against Iranian plans involving expanding naval bases along its shoreline.

He also warned that Iran possess ``large quantities'' of small, fast- attack ships, many armed with torpedoes and Chinese-made high- speed missiles capable of firing from 10,000 yards.

President Bush has repetitively claimed that his administration prefers to solve the Iranian crisis using diplomacy, while on the other hand, he, and many officials at his government, warned that the military option could be used to forcefully stop Iran from pursuing nuclear technology, although it’s a signatory of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

According to intelligence sources cited by many news reports, the U.S. Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency; the CIA, are examining the possible targets that would be hit in case of a military operation against Iran. Such targets would include the facility at Natanz and the facility for enriching uranium at Isfahan.

Earlier this month, John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations told Congress that what he called “diplomatic efforts” had so far been frustrated by Iran's “clout as the world's fourth-largest oil supplier.”

"The Iranians have been very effective at deploying their oil and natural-gas resources to apply leverage against countries to protect themselves from precisely this kind of pressure, in the case of countries with large and growing energy demands like India, China and Japan,'' Bolton said.

Also Ali Larijani, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, was recently quoted as saying that Tehran could be provoked to cut its oil exports as a result of the mounting pressure over its nuclear activities.

Amid nagging concern that Iran, a key exporter, could cut oil supplies because of international pressure, oil prices rose by 17% over the past two months, reaching $72, which reflects the potential impact disruption of Iran’s oil exports would have the next six to 18 months, said Jamal Qureshi, lead oil industry analyst for PFC Energy, a risk-analysis firm in Washington.

Even with that, a military conflict would shock the system so "you'd very likely get a quick spike that could very easily go to $100 a barrel,'' until the U.S. releases oil from its strategic reserve, Qureshi said in an interview.

”It could get messy real quick.''

Even if Iran can't block the strait, said Kenneth Katzman, a terrorism and Middle East analyst for the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, it "can create a sense of crisis to drive up the price of oil, and presumably'' the nations that consume all that oil "would pressure the U.S. to stand down or shrink from confrontation or end it quickly'.'

Iran supplies China with 4% of its oil; France, 7%; Korea, 9%; Japan, 10%; Italy, 11%; Belgium, 14%; Turkey, 22%; and Greece, 24%, according to Clifford Kupchan, a director of the Eurasia Group in Washington, a global risk-consulting group.

These figures "tell me that Iran for the foreseeable future will have considerable 'petro-influence' over prospective U.S. allies,'' Kupchan added.

Last week, Iran's deputy oil minister, M. H. Nejad Hosseinian, was quoted as saying that crude oil prices, currently about 40 per cent higher than a year ago, are expected to hit $100 a barrel this winter as demand outpaces supply.

But prices are still about 20 per cent below the records reached in 1981, when supplies became tight after a revolution in Iran and a war between Iraq and Iran.


Source: Al Jazeera Magazine
http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=11370

Thursday, May 04, 2006

50 Women Named Muslim Preachers in Morocco

2 hours, 37 minutes ago

RABAT, Morocco - Fifty women have graduated as Muslim preachers, part of a concerted effort by authorities in Morocco to promote moderate Islam in a country grappling with extremism.

Another 150 men graduated Wednesday as imams, or prayer leaders. The 50 female religious guides, or morchidat, won't lead prayers in mosques, which is reserved for men, but will be sent around the country to teach women — and, occasionally, men — about Islam.

While Moroccan officials said the appointment of female state preachers was a rare experiment in the Muslim world, others said it was unprecedented in Morocco and the majority of other Arab countries.

"Your duty ... is to prevent intrusion by foreign agents trying to violate our values and traditions," Ahmed Taoufiq, minister of Islamic Affairs, told the graduates Wednesday.

"You must be committed to the faith and politics of the state which the people have chosen. This choice includes the policies of the Amir al Moumenin (Commander of the Faithful) who runs deep in our veins," said Taoufiq, referring to the religious title of King Mohammed VI.

The training of the preachers is part of a campaign launched by the young king, a descendant of the Muslim Prophet Muhammad, to strengthen state-controlled mosques while undermining radical clerics who preach Islamic extremism. He has vowed that no foreign religious doctrine would be tolerated in the North African kingdom, which is a close ally of the United States and a partner in its war against terrorism.

Moroccan officials say the May 16, 2003, suicide bombings in the commercial capital of Casablanca were inspired by radical Muslim clerics who preached violence to poor and disillusioned youths in slums of the big cities.

More than 2,000 people were arrested as a result of the bombings, including Mohammed Fazzazi, who is serving a 30-year-sentence for preaching violence. Two other well-known hard-line Islamic clerics, Abu Hafs and Hassan Kettani, were arrested before the bombings. They were convicted and sentenced to 30 and 20 years in prison respectively for being the ideologists of the Salafia Jihadia militants.

In an interview with a Moroccan weekly six months before the Casablanca blasts, Abu Hafs bragged that his mosque had been packed every Friday since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and that his taped sermons were widely sold. He said the Sept. 11 hijackers were heroes.

Since the Casablanca blasts, Moroccan authorities have been monitoring the country's mosques closely to ensure that they do not recruit insurgents. At least four were shut down following the Sept. 11 attacks. Authorities also try to control — although with little success — the sale of inflammatory books and videotapes.

Friday prayer sermons now must be approved by authorities. Underground mosques are believed to continue to exist, although to a much lesser degree than before the blasts.

The king's initiatives include the creation a year ago of the Mohammed VI Quran radio station that broadcasts religious programs, and the Assadisa Islamic satellite TV station.

The Council of Religious Scholars, established by the king two years ago, has been issuing religious edicts on the most pressing questions of the 21st century — and, surprisingly, they've been well-received by both young people and hardened Islamists.

Taoufiq said 2,000 of Morocco's more than 24,000 mosques will be equipped with TV sets in the comings weeks. Already, the ministry's Web site enables the faithful to chat with religious scholars at 1,000 key mosques in the country.

The pioneer group of morchidat, who finished a yearlong course in Islamic law, philosophy and the history of religions in early April, was trained to give basic religious instructions in mosques and provide support in prisons, hospitals and schools. Their salary is about $500 a month.

Applicants for the course must have a bachelor's degree and be under 45. Male applicants must know the Quran by heart, while female applicants should know at least half of it.

Although it is a first for Morocco — which like many other Muslim countries has shunned the rise of women to senior religious positions — Egypt and Iran have seen an increase in female scholars of Islam.

Even though there are no restrictions in Islam for women to become religious scholars, the male-dominated Muslim societies have generally disputed that women should have a senior position. Any woman wishing to be an imam can lead prayers only for a group of women, not for men.

Fatima Titi, 24, said she was very excited to become a religious guide.

"I am looking forward to portraying a good image of Islam, one that's forgiving and promotes peace," she said.

Source: AP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060504/ap_on_re_af/morocco_moderate_preachers

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Publisher drops 'Opal Mehta' for plagiarism, ends book deal

The debut novel by a Harvard sophomore that faces allegations of plagiarism has been permanently withdrawn and her two-book deal cancelled.

Harvard sophomore and author Kaavya Viswanathan is facing new allegations that her book has passages that resemble the work of Salman Rushdie, Sophie Kinsella and Meg Cabot. (Chitose Suzuki/AP)

Publisher Little, Brown and Company announced cancellation of the deal for Kaavya Viswanathan's How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life, and a promised second novel, Tuesday.

The book was pulled from stores last week after Viswanathan apologized for unintentional similarities to the work of author Megan McCafferty. Little, Brown promised at that time that a revised version would be published.

However, the book was further tarnished this week by allegations it contained additional passages that mimic work by other authors.

"Little, Brown and Company will not be publishing a revised edition of How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life by Kaavya Viswanathan, nor will we publish the second book under contract," Michael Pietsch, Little Brown's senior vice-president and publisher, said in a statement.

The New York Times, the Harvard Crimson and the weblog DesiJournal uncovered passages in Viwanathan's book that are similar to writing by Salman Rushdie (Haroun), Sophie Kinsella (Can You Keep a Secret?) and Meg Cabot (The Princess Diaries ).

When compared side-by-side, the newly discovered passages in Viswanathan's book are obviously similar in style, cadence and construction to those by the other authors.

For instance, in Rushdie's children's novel Haroun, the title character encounters posters bearing slogans such as "If from speed you get your thrill / take precaution – make your will."

In Viswanathan's book, her character Opal Mehta helps another student put up posters bearing slogans like "If from drink you get your thrill / take precaution – write your will."

However, rhyming signage like this is common along roadways in India, the Times acknowledged in its story published Monday.

Another example comes from Kinsella's Can You Keep a Secret. In one scene the main character, Emma, comes upon two friends "in a full-scale argument about animal rights," and one says, "The mink like being made into coats."

In Viswanathan's book, Opal encounters two girls having "a full-fledged debate over animal rights." One of them says: "The foxes want to be made into scarves."

Web community uncovered similar passages

The internet, e-mail, blogs and reader input have all contributed to and facilitated the intense scrutiny on Viswanathan's novel.

McCafferty has said that e-mails from fans first alerted her to the fact that multiple passages in Viswanathan's much-touted new book resembled those in her own titles Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings. A call from a reader tipped the Times off to the additional passages while bloggers have been poring through Viswanathan's novel and comparing notes online.

The Harvard Crimson, the university's daily newspaper, broke news of the similarities on April 23. By the end of the week, Viswanathan had issued a statement acknowledging she had mimicked portions of McCafferty's books but that it had been "unintentional."

Her publisher, Little, Brown, pulled her book from stores last week and the Los Angeles Times reported that Dreamworks has halted production on an upcoming film adaptation of the book.

Some questioned whether the new instances of similar phrasing and passages in Viswanathan's book were indicative of literary constructions and writing techniques common in the "chick lit" genre.

Questions have also been raised about the fact that Viswanathan, as part of her contract with Little, Brown, was working with 17th Street Productions (now Alloy Entertainment) to complete her novel. The company, which develops and produces books and other media properties for teens, is responsible for hit novels such as Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants, and the popular Gossip Girl and Sweet Valley High book series.

Source: CBC
http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/2006/05/02/opal-cancelled.html

Global Warming Weakens Trade Winds


Ker Than
LiveScience Staff Writer
LiveScience.com2 hours, 50 minutes ago

The trade winds in the Pacific Ocean are weakening as a result of global warming, according to a new study that indicates changes to the region's biology are possible.

Using a combination of real-world observations and computer modeling, researchers conclude that a vast loop of circulating wind over the Pacific Ocean, known as the Walker circulation, has weakened by about 3.5 percent since the mid-1800s. The trade winds are the portion of the Walker circulation that blow across the ocean surface.

The researchers predict another 10 percent decrease by the end of the 21st century.

The effect, attributed at least in part to human-induced climate change, could disrupt food chains and reduce the biological productivity of the Pacific Ocean, scientists said.

The study was led by Gabriel Vecchi of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research and is detailed in the May 4 issue of the journal Nature.

Humans to blame

The researchers used records of sea-level atmospheric pressure readings from as far back as the mid-1800s to reconstruct the wind intensity of the Walker circulation over the past 150 years. A computer climate model replicated the effect seen in the historical record.

Some of the computer simulations included the effects of human greenhouse gas emissions; others included only natural factors known to affect climate such as volcanic eruptions and solar variations.

"We were able to ask 'What if humans hadn't done anything? Or what if volcanoes erupted? Or if the sun hadn't varied?'" Vecchi said. "Our only way to account for the observed changes is through the impact of human activity, and principally from greenhouse gases from fossil fuel burning."

Earth's average temperature has risen by about 1 degree Fahrenheit over the past century and many scientists believe greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide emissions from human activities are to blame.

"This is evidence supporting global warming and also evidence of our ability to make reasonable predictions of at least the large scale changes that we should expect from global warming," Vecchi told LiveScience.

By extrapolating their data and combining it with results from other models, the researchers predict the Walker circulation could slow by an additional 10 percent by 2100.

Driving force

The trade winds blow from the east at an angle towards the equator and have been used by sailors for centuries seeking to sail west. Christopher Columbus relied on the Atlantic's trade winds to carry him to North America. The winds get their name from their reliability: To say that a "wind blows trade" is to say that it blows on track.

The overall Walker circulation is powered by warm, rising air in the west Pacific Ocean and sinking cool air in the eastern Pacific.

This looping conveyer belt of winds has far-reaching effects on climate around the globe. It steers ocean currents and nourishes marine life across the equatorial Pacific and off the coast of South America by driving the upwelling of nutrient-rich cold water from ocean depths to the surface.

The Walker circulation is also primarily responsible for transporting water vapor that evaporates from the ocean surface west, towards Indonesia; there, the moisture rises up into the atmosphere, condenses, and falls back to Earth as rain.

The effects of global warming

Several theories on the effects of global warming predict a weakening of the Walker circulation. Scientists think it works like this:

To remain energetically balanced, the rate at which the atmosphere absorbs water vapor must be balanced by the rate of rainfall. But as temperatures rise and more water evaporates from the ocean, water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases rapidly. Because of various physical processes, however, the rate of rainfall does not increase as fast.

Since the atmosphere is absorbing moisture faster than it can dump it, and because wind is the major transporter of moisture into the atmosphere, air circulation must slow down if the energy balance is to be maintained.

A drop in winds could reduce the strength of both surface and subsurface ocean currents and dampen cold water upwelling at the equator.

"This could have important effects on ocean ecosystems," Vecchi said. "The ocean currents driven by the trade winds supply vital nutrients to near-surface ocean ecosystems across the equatorial Pacific, which is a major fishing region."

VIDEO: The End of the Earth El Nino Now Blamed for Practically Everything Global Warming May Play Role in Hurricane Intensity Conflicting Claims on Global Warming and Why It's All Moot Natural Disasters: Top 10 U.S. Threats

Visit LiveScience.com for more daily news, views and scientific inquiry with an original, provocative point of view. LiveScience reports amazing, real world breakthroughs, made simple and stimulating for people on the go. Check out our collection of Science, Animal and Dinosaur Image Galleries, Science Videos, Amazing Images, Interactive Features and Reader Favorites, Trivia and more. Get cool gadgets at the new LiveScience Store, sign up for our free daily email newsletter and check out our RSS feeds today!

Source: Space.com via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20060503/sc_space/globalwarming...RPUCUl

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

India sends more troops to hunt Kashmir killers

Tue May 2, 2006 7:30 AM BST170

JAMMU, India (Reuters) - India rushed hundreds of extra troops to hunt for Islamist militants in the remote mountains of Kashmir on Tuesday, after 35 Hindus were killed over two days in one of the worst massacres in the region in years.

The troop deployment began as a general strike -- called to protest against the killings -- shut down the predominantly Hindu Jammu region of Indian Kashmir, where some half a million soldiers and policemen are deployed.

Suspected Islamist militants shot dead 22 Hindus in two villages in the mountains of Doda district, 170 km (106 miles) northeast of Jammu, Kashmir's winter capital, early on Monday.

On the same day, nine bullet-riddled bodies of Hindus were found in the neighbouring district of Udhampur. Four more bodies had been found in the same area on Sunday.

"We are definitely augmenting troop levels to prevent easier movement of militants in these areas," a senior police officer told Reuters.

New Delhi has been accused in the past of failing to protect Kashmir's Hindus, who are a minority in mainly Hindu India's only Muslim-majority state.

An Islamist revolt against Indian rule in the disputed region -- claimed both by India and Pakistan and ruled by them in parts -- has killed more than 45,000 people since 1989.

The attacks on Hindus in Doda and Udhampur came ahead of talks between Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Kashmir's main political separatist alliance, the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, due in New Delhi on Wednesday.

Schools, banks and offices in many areas in Doda and Udhampur districts were closed and traffic was largely limited to security vehicles and government cars.

Residents of Kashmir, a region that triggered two of three India-Pakistan wars, said they were weary of violence.

"We have seen so much bloodshed that some of have us have become insensitive. These killings should end," Thakur Dass, who was visiting a relative wounded in the Doda attack, told Reuters by telephone.

Indian officials say the overall level of separatist violence has come down in the revolt-torn region since India and Pakistan launched new moves to make peace three years ago.

But there has been a spike in militant attacks in recent weeks with the melting of winter snow, which makes movement of militants easier in the mountainous region.

Some Indian officials say the massacre could be a response to high voter turnout in by-elections last week in Doda, and could be aimed at souring the mood ahead of Wednesday's talks.

Pakistan condemned the killings.

"We condemn all acts of terrorism. We are against terrorism because we ourselves have been victim of terrorism," Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.

Indian and Pakistani officials are due to hold two days of talks in New Delhi beginning Tuesday to discuss moves to boost links between the two sides of Kashmir administered by them.

Source: Reuters
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type_KASHMIR.xml

Monday, May 01, 2006

Israel kills woman in W Bank raid

Israeli soldiers have killed a Palestinian woman during a raid in the West Bank town of Tulkarm.

Eitas Zalat, 41, died and her two daughters were slightly wounded as Israeli troops opened fire during the arrest of an alleged militant.

An Israeli army spokesman said that "shooting broke out when a top official of Islamic Jihad" resisted arrest.

The spokesman said the army was very sorry "when innocent people are hurt", and promised a full investigation.

Several people were arrested during the Israeli military operation in the West Bank.

Source: BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4961706.stm

California Becomes Second State to Introduce Bush Impeachment

By David Swanson

Joining Illinois, California has become the second state in which a proposal to impeach President Bush has been introduced in the state legislature. And this one includes Cheney as well.

California Assemblyman Paul Koretz of Los Angeles (where the LA Times has now called for Cheney's resignation) has submitted amendments to Assembly Joint Resolution No. 39, calling for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney. The amendments reference Section 603 of Jefferson's Manual of the Rules of the United States House of Representatives, which allows federal impeachment proceedings to be initiated by joint resolution of a state legislature.

The resolution, in the words of Koretz's press release, "bases the call for impeachment upon the Bush Administration intentionally misleading the Congress and the American people regarding the threat from Iraq in order to justify an unnecessary war that has cost billions of dollars and thousands of lives and casualties; exceeding constitutional authority to wage war by invading Iraq; exceeding constitutional authority by Federalizing the National Guard; conspiring to torture prisoners in violation of the 'Federal Torture Act' and indicating intent to continue such actions; spying on American citizens in violation of the 1978 Foreign Agency Surveillance Act; leaking and covering up the leak of the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, and holding American citizens without charge or trial."

Koretz submitted amendments gutting AJR No. 39, a resolution unrelated to impeachment, to the Assembly Rules Committee. The Rules Committee may take up the bill this week for referral, allowing him to formally introduce the amended resolution.

AJR 39 is a bill introduced in January by Koretz calling for a moratorium on depleted uranium:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ajr_39_bill_20060104_introduced.html

"At both the state and national levels," Koretz said, "we will be paying for the Bush Administration's illegal actions and terrible lack of judgment and competence for decades—not only in the billions of dollars wasted on the war and welfare for the rich, but in the worldwide loss of respect for America and Americans. Bush and Cheney must be impeached and removed from office before they undertake even deadlier misdeeds, such as the use of nuclear weapons. There are no bounds to their willingness to ignore the Constitution and world opinion—we can't afford to wait for the next disaster and hope that we can survive it."

For more inormation and to thank this American hero, contact Paul Michael Neuman in Koretz's District Office: (310) 285-5490 paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov or go here:
http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a42/contact.htm

Here is a kit to help with promoting this resolution and with passing others in your towns and cities and states. Also on this page is information on activities in other states and localities:
http://www.impeachpac.org/resolutions

Get organized in California to pass this bill!
http://pdamerica.org/statecaucus.php?s=ca

Illinois Legislators Were First to Introduce Bill for Bush Impeachment

Three members of the Illinois General Assembly have introduced a bill that urges the General Assembly to submit charges to the U. S. House of Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States, George W. Bush, for willfully violating his Oath of Office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and if found guilty urges his removal from office and disqualification to hold any other office in the United States.

The Jefferson Manual of rules for the U.S. House of Representatives makes clear that impeachment proceedings can be initiated by a state legislature submitting charges. The state of Illinois is on its way toward forcing on the House what not a single one of its members has yet had the courage to propose: Articles of Impeachment.

The text of the Illinois bill and information on its status are available here:
http://tinyurl.com/nhs3r

The bill takes up the issues of illegal spying, torture, detentions without charge or trial, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, and the leaking of classified information.

Please thank these sponsors of the bill:

Rep. Karen A. Yarbrough, phone (217) 782-8120 or (708) 615-1747; fax (708) 615-1745

Rep Sara Feigenholtz , phone (217) 782-8062 or (773) 296-4141; fax (217) 557-7203 or (773) 296-0993

Rep. Eddie Washington phone (217) 558-1012 or (847) 623-0060, fax (847) 623-6078

Here is a kit to help with promoting this resolution and with passing others in your towns and cities. Also on this page is information on activities in other states and localities:
http://www.impeachpac.org/resolutions

Get organized in Illinois to pass this bill!
http://pdamerica.org/statecaucus.php?s=il

This article
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/9249

Future updates:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org


Authors Website: http://www.davidswanson.org

Authors Bio: DAVID SWANSON is a co-founder of After Downing Street, a writer and activist, and the Washington Director of Democrats.com. He is a board member of Progressive Democrats of America, and serves on the Executive Council of the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, TNG-CWA. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and as a communications director, with jobs including Press Secretary for Dennis Kucinich's 2004 presidential campaign, Media Coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association, and three years as Communications Coordinator for ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. Swanson obtained a Master's degree in philosophy from the University of Virginia in 1997


Source: OpEdNews.com
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_david_sw_060424_california_becomes_s.htm

Sunday, April 30, 2006

Break Up the Big Oil Cartel

Republican Rhetoric; Democratic Cluelessness

Break Up the Big Oil Cartel

By RALPH NADER

What a week it has been for the giant oil companies! Billions in record quarterly profits rushing into their coffers. An even bigger round of quarterly profits coming up. Gargantuan executive pay bonanzas. And a pile of "forces beyond our control" excuses to publicize in response to the empty outrage of Washington politicians and the real squeeze on consumers and small businesses.

Oil man Bush, atop his administration marinated with ex-oil executives in high positions, keeps saying there is little he can do. It is the market of supply and demand. Only fuel cells and hydrogen sometime down the 21st-century road can save the country from dependency on foreign oil, he says repeatedly. Plus more drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge.

The public heat about energy prices prodded Mr. Bush this week, however, to at least make a little change in rhetoric. He repeated his warning that his government will not tolerate any gouging. Yet the supine reporters did not ask him whether he has ever caught a gouger. But he did mumble something about higher fuel economy standards so that your car guzzles a little less gasoline. He said he will be meeting with the domestic auto company executives in the White House in mid-May. He praised ethanol again. He visited a gas station in Mississippi to feel the pain of the motorists.

Will Hollywood ever leave Washington, DC?

On Capitol Hill--aka wurthering heights--the Republicans are starting to talk tough, mumbling about larger taxes on oil industry profits--an idea Bush said he would veto last year. The Democrats cannot even agree on an excess profits tax, preferring the greasy band-aid of lifting the 18.4 cent gasoline tax for sixty days. This new detour is pathetic since it takes the heat off the industry's skyrocketing gasoline price which are well into the $3 to $4/gallon range in many places.

A few, very few members of Congress, like Senator Byron Dorgan (D--North Dakota) know what has to be done to this industry and its long-time grip over the federal government. First, the gouging profits must be recaptured and returned now to the consumer. The government must also invest in advanced public transit systems.

Big oil has been on a marriage binge and the mergers, including the wedding of Exxon (number one) and Mobil (number two), have tightened further the corporate cartel of oil as it feeds off the government producers' cartel of oil abroad. Antitrust break up action is necessary.

The claim by the oil barons that they're just responding to the marketplace of supply and demand is laughable. Why are they making double and triple profits? Why are their top executives tripling their own pay? Hard-pressed sellers of oil would not have such a luxurious profit and pay spiral. Hard-pressed sellers of oil would not have paid $144,000 every day to Exxon CEO, Lee Raymond since 1993 and then send him off with a $398 million retirement deal.

A competitive domestic oil industry would not be so able to close down scores of refineries and then turn "refinery shortages" into higher gas prices at the pump. Nor would competitive companies get away with a return on capital of 46 percent for upstream drilling and production operations, plus a 32 percent for refining and marketing. Washington Post business reporter, Steven Pearlstein, call these returns "hedge fund returns." Except with hedge funds there is a risk of losing from time to time. Not so with the corporate government of Big Oil.

A President, preoccupied with his criminal, fabricated war in Iraq, would not leave Americans defenseless as oil prices eat into their family budgets. A standup President would order an all-fronts investigation of the oil industry's pricing practices from the oil well to the gasoline station.

There would be full use of subpoenas and public testimony from the oil bosses under oath by his regulatory agencies. He would organize with his Republican majority in Congress a repeal of past and recent unconscionable tax breaks and stop giving away your oil on federal property in the Gulf of Mexico to the oil companies without any royalties. He would press for an excess-profits tax and legislation raising by statute the fuel efficiency performance for new motor vehicles, including SUVs, Minivans and light trucks.

A standup President would raise margin requirements to tone down the speculation in oil futures that are swelling the New York Mercantile Exchange and contributing to higher gasoline and heating oil prices. He would support tariffs on imported refinery products to push the companies to expand and build new cleaner refineries in the U.S. Where? In some of the exact locations where the oil industry shut down these refineries over the past thirty years to contract overall output and move operations to cheap labor locations abroad.

A standup President would give an address to the nation that mobilizes small and larger businesses which use oil to join with consumers in a common cause against the looming inflationary jolts that will raise prices for many regular products and lead to higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve.

Bush can never proactively do this for the American people who already by more than a 2 to 1 margin believe he cares more about the interests of Big Business than the interests of regular people.

But, mobilized small business can get him to relent and let some of these changes happen.

The small business revolt can start with several hundred economically squeezed truckers bringing their 18 wheelers to Washington in a protest that encircles in a wide arc the Congress and the White House and the federal buildings in between. Now that would be more than a message. It would be an irresistible visual image for the television cameras day after day.

Source: CounterPunch
http://www.counterpunch.com/nader04292006.html

Friday, April 28, 2006

Musharraf says he's no US "poodle"

Thu Apr 27, 10:22 PM ET

Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf has rejected accusations he is a Western "poodle," saying his fight against Islamic militants is for his country's benefit, not for the United States or Britain.

"I am nobody's poodle," he said in an interview with Britain's Guardian newspaper on Friday. "I have enough strength of my own to lead.

"When you talk about fighting terrorism or extremism, I am not doing that for the U.S. or Britain, I am doing it for Pakistan."

Musharraf, an important ally in the U.S.-led war on terrorism, has faced repeated opposition protests about his relationship with President Bush.

A 10,000-strong crowd gathered in the central Punjab region last month to hear opposition leader Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman call a visit by Bush an attempt at "enslaving the Pakistani nation and rewarding General Musharraf for his patriotism to America."

Newspapers have carried critical pieces on U.S. foreign policy in Pakistan and one has a "Mush & Bush" column lampooning the two leaders' relationship.

Asked by the Guardian if he had the "teeth" to bite back at his Western allies, Musharraf said: "Yes sir, I personally do -- a lot of teeth. Sometimes the teeth do not have to be shown. Pragmatism is required in international relations."

Pakistan has captured or killed hundreds of al Qaeda members since Musharraf joined a U.S.-led war on terrorism after the September 11 attacks on the United States.

Anger has been building in Pakistan over repeated U.S. attacks in the country, including an airstrike in January which killed 18 civilians in the remote Bajaur region.

Musharraf told the Guardian: "The strike was an infringement of our sovereignty and I condemned it."

Source: Reuters via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/pakistan_musharraf_dc

Pakistan scales back F-16 purchases from US

Pakistan scales back F-16 purchases from US
By Farhan Bokhari in Islamabad
Published: April 28 2006 11:49 | Last updated: April 28 2006 11:49

Pakistan has scaled back by half its ambitious planned purchase of new fighter planes from the US to help pay for the relief costs of last year’s devastating earthquake.

ADVERTISEMENT

Foreign secretary Riaz Mohammad Khan announced on a visit to Washington that rather than buy new Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters, Pakistan would purchase “a mix” of old and new planes. The plan would be “far less ambitious”, he said without giving figures.

Western diplomats familiar with the US-Pakistan discussions said Pakistan was now likely to spend US$1.6bn-US$1.8bn on the F-16s, down from as much as U$3.5bn.

The original plan for at least 75 new F-16s had been cut to 18 new and 36 used planes, with an option for a further 23 fighters some time in the future, said one western diplomat.

The US last year lifted a 15-year-old ban on the export of F-16s to Pakistan, a key ally in its war on terror. “We are committed to the sale of American F-16 aircraft to Pakistan and we intend to begin [formal] consultations with Congress shortly,”said Nick Burns, US undersecretary of state, on Thursday.

October’s earthquake forced Pakistan to postpone the purchase as it sought more than US$5.2bn from donors to help with reconstruction costs.

“It is possible that the US urged Pakistan to be more realistic about how much money it could spend on this deal. The Bush administration must have thought Pakistan would loose its goodwill with other donors such as Europeans if it insisted on such a large spending on defence,” said the western diplomat.

Earlier this month, the Pakistani cabinet approved the purchase of 77 F-16s, although it was not clear if these were all new planes.

It also approved air force plans to buy an unspecified number of Jian-10 fighter planes from China.

Diplomats said on Friday they had no evidence of any change in plans over the J10 purchase, which was currently for up to 36 fighter planes in a deal worth up to US$1.5bn.

The Pakistani Air Force favours a purchase of fighter planes from a source other than the US because of concerns about a repeat of Washington’s past sanction on the F-16s which sharply widened the gap between the capability of the PAF and its closest rival, the Indian Air Force.

Source: Financial Times
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/c82f265e-d6a3-11da-b64c-0000779e2340.html

Silverstein surrenders right to develop Freedom Tower

Larry Silverstein, the Manhattan developer who has fought a nearly five-year battle to maintain control of rebuilding on the World Trade Center site, on Tuesday surrendered the right to develop the Freedom Tower, the tallest and most symbolic of the buildings on the 16-acre property.

The agreement was hailed as the end of months of stalemate and inaction at Ground Zero that has increasingly become an embarrassment for New York officials. All five buildings on the site are planned to be completed by 2012 under the new framework.

Under its terms, Mr Silverstein will yield control of the Freedom Tower and one other building to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. But he will still have the right to build three other buildings on the site, which are thought to have more commercial potential than the Freedom Tower.

Michael Bloomberg, New York’s mayor, and officials from the Port Authority have been putting pressure on Mr Silverstein for several months in the hopes of wresting some control of the project from him. Talks have been acrimonious at times, with both sides accusing each other of impeding progress on the site.

“Make no mistake, we have made real concessions,” Mr Silverstein said. ”This is about moving the rebuilding forward as quickly as possible.”

Tuesday’s agreement was a re-structuring of the 99-year lease that Mr Silverstein signed just six weeks before the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks. Under the new terms, Mr Silverstein will turn over 38 per cent of the insurance proceeds he received to the Port Authority. He will also continue to pay rent to the Port Authority as if the Twin Towers still existed and were fully leased.

But Mr Silverstein still stands to gain from the terms of the new lease. He will be paid a fee to build the Freedom Tower. And he would also gain control over a shopping centre on the site.

Both sides have acknowledged that the Freedom Tower - estimated to cost about $2bn - carries significant risks as a commercial enterprise, since it is not expected to attract corporate clients. But George Pataki, New York governor, has pledged to secure tenants from federal and state agencies, a strategy that recalls the early days of the original World Trade Center. And construction costs will be offset by tax-free Liberty bonds in addition to the insurance proceeds.

Source: Financial Times
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/192ae362-d4ac-11da-a357-0000779e2340.html

________________________________________
Editor's Note: Larry Silverstein benefited greatly from September 11th attacks, particularly from the destruction of his WTC Building #7. In total, he collected more than $5 billion dollars in insurance settlements. Some conspiracy theorists allege him being part of a bigger inside job. (Another reference).

Thursday, April 27, 2006

NBA OR NFL?


36
have been accused of spousal abuse


7
have been arrested for fraud


19
have been accused of writing bad checks


117
have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses


3
have done time for assault


71,
repeat
71 cannot
get a credit card due to bad credit


14
have been arrested on drug-related charges


8
have been arrested for shoplifting


21
currently
are defendants in lawsuits, and


84
have been arrested for drunk driving
within the last year



Can
you guess which organization this is? NBA? NFL?



Give up? Scroll down








Neither.
It's the 535 members of
the United States Congress.







The same group who crank out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep US in line.

Source: Chain e-mail letter

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Fox News host is new Bush spokesman

Wednesday 26 April 2006, 17:50 Makka Time, 14:50 GMT

Tony Snow, a commentator and radio host with the Fox News network, has been named as the new White House press secretary, putting a new face on a troubled administration.

Snow replaces Scott McClellan, who announced his resignation last week as part of a staff shake-up engineered by Josh Bolten, the new White House chief of staff, directed at reviving George Bush's presidency.

Bush made the announcement on Wednesday.

"My job is to make decisions and his job is to help explain those decisions to the press corps and the American people," Bush said, with Snow and McClellan at his side in the White House briefing room.

Snow's appointment is notable in a White House that has a reputation for not suffering criticism. He even has had some harsh things to say about Bush.

Sources familiar with the situation said Snow wrestled with the decision for several days on whether to take the job.

A speechwriter for the senior Bush when the latter was the president, Snow was treated for colon cancer last year.

Fox News said on its website that Snow was given a clean bill of health by his oncologist on Tuesday, after a CAT scan and other tests that were undertaken last Thursday.

He was said to have been waiting for the all-clear from his doctors before accepting the job.

Active role

Snow, 50, a conservative pundit, has been host of Fox News Radio's The Tony Snow Show and for a time was anchor of the Fox News Sunday programme.

The Washington Post said Snow decided to accept the job after top officials assured him that he would not be just a spokesman but an active participant in administration policy debates.

The Post quoted sources as saying that Snow viewed himself as well-positioned to ease the tensions between the Bush White House and the press corps because he understood politics and journalism.

Snow, in an Associated Press interview on Tuesday, did not dispute that he has been a tough critic of Bush.

"It's public record," he said. "I've written some critical stuff. When you're a columnist, you're going to criticise and you're going to praise."

A liberal think tank, the Center for American Progress, circulated a sampling of Snow's opinions, restricting the observations to those critical of the president.

It quoted Snow in September as writing, "No president has looked this impotent this long when it comes to defending presidential powers and prerogatives."

Last month, Snow wrote that Bush and the Republican Congress had "lost control of the federal budget and cannot resist the temptation to stop raiding the public fisc. (treasury)."

Staff shake-up

Since taking over as Bush's chief of staff, Bolten has embarked on a shake-up in a drive to revive the presidency and rebound from job approval ratings that, according to a CNN poll this week, have dipped to an all-time low of 32%.

Last week, in addition to McClellan's resignation, the shake-up led to Karl Rove, senior Bush political adviser, giving up his day-to-day policy role to focus on helping Republicans retain control of both houses of the US Congress in November mid-term elections.

Snow, a native of Cincinnati, Ohio, will be a rare case in which a Washington journalist takes over as the White House spokesman.

The job will come with a pay cut, down to about $161,000 a year.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

5 Truths About Darfur

By Emily Wax
Sunday, April 23, 2006; B03

KOU KOU ANGARANA, Chad

Heard all you need to know about Darfur? Think again. Three years after a government-backed militia began fighting rebels and residents in this region of western Sudan, much of the conventional wisdom surrounding the conflict -- including the religious, ethnic and economic factors that drive it -- fails to match the realities on the ground. Tens of thousands have died and some 2.5 million have been displaced, with no end to the conflict in sight. Here are five truths to challenge the most common misconceptions about Darfur:

1 Nearly everyone is Muslim

Early in the conflict, I was traveling through the desert expanses of rebel-held Darfur when, amid decapitated huts and dead livestock, our SUV roared up to an abandoned green and white mosque, riddled with bullets, its windows shattered.

In my travels, I've seen destroyed mosques all over Darfur. The few men left in the villages shared the same story: As government Antonov jets dropped bombs, Janjaweed militia members rode in on horseback and attacked the town's mosque -- usually the largest structure in town. The strange thing, they said, was that the attackers were Muslim, too. Darfur is home to some of Sudan's most devout Muslims, in a country where 65 percent of the population practices Islam, the official state religion.

A long-running but recently pacified war between Sudan's north and south did have religious undertones, with the Islamic Arab-dominated government fighting southern Christian and animist African rebels over political power, oil and, in part, religion.

"But it's totally different in Darfur," said Mathina Mydin, a Malaysian nurse who worked in a clinic on the outskirts of Nyala, the capital of South Darfur. "As a Muslim myself, I wanted to bring the sides together under Islam. But I quickly realized this war had nothing to do with religion."

2 Everyone is black

Although the conflict has also been framed as a battle between Arabs and black Africans, everyone in Darfur appears dark-skinned, at least by the usual American standards. The true division in Darfur is between ethnic groups, split between herders and farmers. Each tribe gives itself the label of "African" or "Arab" based on what language its members speak and whether they work the soil or herd livestock. Also, if they attain a certain level of wealth, they call themselves Arab.

Sudan melds African and Arab identities. As Arabs began to dominate the government in the past century and gave jobs to members of Arab tribes, being Arab became a political advantage; some tribes adopted that label regardless of their ethnic affiliation. More recently, rebels have described themselves as Africans fighting an Arab government. Ethnic slurs used by both sides in recent atrocities have riven communities that once lived together and intermarried.

"Black Americans who come to Darfur always say, 'So where are the Arabs? Why do all these people look black?' " said Mahjoub Mohamed Saleh, editor of Sudan's independent Al-Ayam newspaper. "The bottom line is that tribes have intermarried forever in Darfur. Men even have one so-called Arab wife and one so-called African. Tribes started labeling themselves this way several decades ago for political reasons. Who knows what the real bloodlines are in Darfur?"

3 It's all about politics

Although analysts have emphasized the racial and ethnic aspects of the conflict in Darfur, a long-running political battle between Sudanese President Omar Hassan Bashir and radical Islamic cleric Hassan al-Turabi may be more relevant.

A charismatic college professor and former speaker of parliament, Turabi has long been one of Bashir's main political rivals and an influential figure in Sudan. He has been fingered as an extremist; before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks Turabi often referred to Osama bin Laden as a hero. More recently, the United Nations and human rights experts have accused Turabi of backing one of Darfur's key rebel groups, the Justice and Equality Movement, in which some of his top former students are leaders.

Because of his clashes with Bashir, Turabi is usually under house arrest and holds forth in his spacious Khartoum villa for small crowds of followers and journalists. But diplomats say he still mentors rebels seeking to overthrow the government.

"Darfur is simply the battlefield for a power struggle over Khartoum," said Ghazi Suleiman, a Sudanese human rights lawyer. "That's why the government hit back so hard. They saw Turabi's hand, and they want to stay in control of Sudan at any cost."

4 This conflict is international

China and Chad have played key roles in the Darfur conflict.

In 1990, Chad's Idriss Deby came to power by launching a military blitzkrieg from Darfur and overthrowing President Hissan Habre. Deby hails from the elite Zaghawa tribe, which makes up one of the Darfur rebel groups trying to topple the government. So when the conflict broke out, Deby had to decide whether to support Sudan or his tribe. He eventually chose his tribe.

Now the Sudanese rebels have bases in Chad; I interviewed them in towns full of Darfurians who tried to escape the fighting. Meanwhile, Khartoum is accused of supporting Chad's anti-Deby rebels, who have a military camp in West Darfur. (Sudan's government denies the allegations.) Last week, bands of Chadian rebels nearly took over the capital, N'Djamena. When captured, some of the rebels were carrying Sudanese identification.

Meanwhile, Sudan is China's fourth-biggest supplier of imported oil, and that relationship carries benefits. China, which holds veto power in the U.N. Security Council, has said it will stand by Sudan against U.S. efforts to slap sanctions on the country and in the battle to force Sudan to replace the African Union peacekeepers with a larger U.N. presence. China has built highways and factories in Khartoum, even erecting the Friendship Conference Hall, the city's largest public meeting place.

5 The "genocide" label made it worse

Many of the world's governments have drawn the line at labeling Darfur as genocide. Some call the conflict a case of ethnic cleansing, and others have described it as a government going too far in trying to put down a rebellion.

But in September 2004, then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell referred to the conflict as a "genocide." Rather than spurring greater international action, that label only seems to have strengthened Sudan's rebels; they believe they don't need to negotiate with the government and think they will have U.S. support when they commit attacks. Peace talks have broken down seven times, partly because the rebel groups have walked out of negotiations. And Sudan's government has used the genocide label to market itself in the Middle East as another victim of America's anti-Arab and anti-Islamic policies.

Perhaps most counterproductive, the United States has failed to follow up with meaningful action. "The word 'genocide' was not an action word; it was a responsibility word," Charles R. Snyder, the State Department's senior representative on Sudan, told me in late 2004. "There was an ethical and moral obligation, and saying it underscored how seriously we took this." The Bush administration's recent idea of sending several hundred NATO advisers to support African Union peacekeepers falls short of what many advocates had hoped for.

"We called it a genocide and then we wine and dine the architects of the conflict by working with them on counterterrorism and on peace in the south," said Ted Dagne, an Africa expert for the Congressional Research Service. "I wish I knew a way to improve the situation there. But it's only getting worse."

waxe@washpost.com

Emily Wax is The Washington Post's East Africa bureau chief.

Source: WashingtonPost.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/21/AR2006042101752.html

Monday, April 24, 2006

Pakistan to take over multi-national task force command

The Pakistan navy will take over the command of the multi-national Task Force-150 of the Coalition Maritime Campaign Plan (CMCP) on Monday.

"In recognition of the Pakistan navy's professional ability and increased mutual confidence, Pakistan has been offered the Command of Multi National Task Force Group 150," said the Pakistan navy Sunday in a statement.

The CMCP is the maritime component of "Operation Enduring Freedom" being undertaken by a U.S.-led coalition of naval forces in the Golf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Arabian Gulf and Horn of Africa since October 2001.

Presently the command is held by the Dutch Navy.

Pakistan will be the first non-NATO country to take over the command. Pakistan's Rear Admiral Shahid Iqbal will be the Commander of Task Force-150, said the statement.

The legal basis for Operation Enduring Freedom is United Nations Resolution 1373, adopted by the UN Security Council at its 8345th meeting on Sept. 28, 2001, according to the statement.

"This operation aims to prevent, deter and destroy international terrorist organizations by denying them the use of maritime environment thereby contributing towards stability and security in Indian Ocean," the statement said.

"This will go a long way in projecting Pakistan's positive image in international community and will significantly highlight the Pakistan navy's contribution towards global war on terrorism."

Upon approval from the government of Pakistan, the Pakistan navy joined the CMCP in April 2004.

Other nations presently participating in the CMCP are the United States, Britain, France, Australia, Italy, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain.

A maritime coalition that patrols 5th Fleet waters is getting new leadership. On April 24, Pakistani naval forces will assume command of Task Force 150, which patrols the waters off the Horn of Africa and within the Gulfs of Aden and Oman and the Arabian Sea, according to Cmdr. Jeff Breslau, public affairs officer for 5th Fleet/Naval Forces Central Command in Bahrain.

Formed in December 2001 in response to the terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon, Task Force 150 rotates command among coalition member nations. The intent is to deny terrorists and other transnational threats use of the sea in that region.

Breslau said the Pakistani command will a first for that country since the task force was formed.

France, Germany, the United States and Pakistan have an ongoing commitment to the force. Naval forces from Canada, Great Britain, Italy and the Netherlands also participate periodically, and the Dutch are currently in charge of the task force.

The U.S. Navy contributes at least one warship to Task Force 150. The force usually numbers between six and 12 warships.

Ships from the task force have been involved in several contacts with suspected pirates of the coast of Somalia in recent months.

Sources:
Xinhua
http://english.people.com.cn/200604/24/eng20060424_260595.html
and
Marine Corps Times
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1720305.php

Mughal-e-Azam, 1st Indian film in Pak. in 41 yrs

New Delhi, April 23 (UNI) Emperor Akbar and Anarkali have pipped Shah Jahan and Mumtaz in the race to hit Pakistani theatres!

Even as there was widespread buzz in recent weeks that Akbar Khan's 'Taj Mahal-An eternal Love Story' would be the first Indian film to make it to Indian theatres on April 28, K Asif's 'Mughal-E-Azam' quietly hits the Pakistan theatres on Saturday, thus becoming the first film to be released in Pakistan after 41 years.

Akbar Asif, son of the late K Asif who produced and directed the legendary classic, said the film would be premiered today at Pakistan's Gulistan cinema.

The film's premiere, the preparations for which began late yesterday, was being held for selected government officials, socialites and other important personalities. As part of the preparations for the film's premiere, Gulistan Cinema was decorated with a special set designed by Tanveer Fatima. Mughal-e-Azam' thus becomes the first film to successfully open the cinematic gates of Pakistan for Bollywood films.

Considering that the London-based Akbar Asif had planned a grandiose release for 'Mughal-e-Azam', including a hunt to find a new Anarkali through a major television hunt spreading over six months, the quiet move to release the film comes as a surprise. Initially, the film was to hit the theatres in Pakistan on June 2 amid grand celebrations. Elaborate plans had been made to release the film in the presence of actors from around the globe and royalty, complete with fireworks from Japan.

Infact, Asif's initial plans were to make the release as grand as the epic film itself.

However, when it became evident that Akbar Khan's 'Taj Mahal' would beat 'Mughal-e-Azam' in the race to hit the Pakistani theatres by releasing on April 28, Akbar Asif dropped plans for a grandiose release as he wanted his film to be the first Indian cinematic venture to hit theatres in the neighbouring country.

With this thought, Akbar Asif quietly moved his papers with the Pakistan government and finally the decision to have Mughal-E-Azam as the first film to be screened in Pakistan came through.

"The move to ensure that 'Mughal-E-Azam' turned out to be the cultural bridge between India and Pakistan was to fulfill my father's dream of getting Mughal-E-Azam to be the first film to get permission to be screened in Pakistan,"Asif said.

Source: The Hindu
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/009200604230352.htm

R E L A T E D

Pakistan allows showing of Indian films after 6 decades
Last Updated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:44:48 EDT
CBC Arts


Film lovers lined up at theatres in Lahore, Pakistan, on Sunday to see the first Indian movie allowed to be screened in the country for almost 60 years.

Mughal-e-Azam, or The Great Mogul, is an historical romance made in 1960 in Mumbai but set in Lahore at the time when Muslim leaders ruled India. The story of a doomed love affair between a prince and a slave girl has been dubbed the India’s answer to the American Civil War epic Gone With The Wind.

Pakistani theatres are forbidden from showing Indian films, but the government bowed to lobbying from the film industries in both countries. Indian movies are available through pirated videotapes and discs and some independent cable stations show them late at night.

“I've seen it a dozen times on video, but watching Mughal-e-Azam on the big screen was special,'' said Abdul Waheed, 75, after buying his ticket for the first screening of the classic in Pakistan.

Members of Pakistan’s film industry lobbied to have the film and another one, Taj Mahal, released in Pakistani cinemas.

Taj Mahal, a new Bollywood epic, will be released later this week in Pakistan.

Backers of Taj Mahal won over the government by donating millions of rupees to a relief fund for victims of the October 2005 earthquake in the disputed Kashmir region. About 70,000 people died and more than two million in the area are still homeless.

Those working in film on both sides of the border hope the relaxation of rules will lead to greater understanding between the two nations, who have teetered on the brink of war since 1947 when the British partitioned India, creating Pakistan.

Mughal-e-Azam took nine years to make and has special resonance with Muslims in both countries. There are approximately 145 million Muslims each in India and Pakistan and many who left Pakistan 59 years ago have since become prominent members of India’s movie-making industry.

Dilip Kumar, who plays the male lead in the film, was born Yusuf Khan in Peshawar, in northwest Pakistan.

“It is good that the government has allowed the screening of this historic movie. It will not only help revive Pakistani cinema, but it will also strengthen the peace process between Pakistan and India,'' Nadeem Mandviwala, Mughal-e-Azam's distributor, told Reuters.

Source: CBC.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/2006/04/23/india-film-pakistan.html

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Farmer suicide on rise as India's rural crisis deepens

Sat Apr 22, 6:46 AM ET

Despite failed crops and mounting debts, the family of Indian cotton farmer Chandrakant Gurenule never believed his suicide threats until he set himself alight and fled their home in flames.

The ambitious 34-year-old bought the latest, expensive, high-yield genetically-modified cotton seeds for his 15-acre (six-hectare) farm in this parched corner of India's vast rural hinterland only for his crops to fail for two successive years.

He sold the pair of bullocks he used to plough the fields, and told his wife -- whose wedding jewellery had already been given to unofficial moneylenders -- there was no hope left.

He sat inside his home, doused himself in kerosene and lit a match.

His death on April 1 was one of the latest in a crisis that saw more than 4,100 farmers commit suicide in the western state of Maharashtra alone in 2004, according to a state government-backed report based on police figures.

Officials confirm that the deaths are increasing at a faster rate than ever before in a country that already has the second highest suicide rate in the region, according to the World Health Organisation.

Indian government officials have said more than 8,900 farmers had died in four states since 2001, putting the Maharashtra figure at only 980 as opposed to 4,100 -- a number dismissed as far too low by activists.

"In such hostile conditions when there is no ray of hope, the farmer commits suicide," says Kishor Tiwari, an activist who has documented some 450 suicide deaths in just one part of the state in the last year.

Agriculture is essential to the well-being of Indian society as it employs some 60 percent of the country's workforce and accounts for a quarter of India's GDP.

Immediate survival was on the minds of Gurenule's family at their home in the village of Sayatkhada.

His young widow clutched his framed photograph and their two children while his distraught father Bapurao, 75, sat on the floor and wept.

"I hold my head and I think of him. I have lost him and don't know what to do now," he said. "There is nothing we can do."

Three years ago, the Gurenules, persuaded by their local farm agent, took the first step to move into raising GM crops, and trials gave good results.

They increased the amount they bought the following year, even though the cost of one bag of seed was 1,600 rupees, compared with the 450 rupees they used to pay, but that year's crop failed because of drought.

So they bought even more as part of a 70,000-rupee (1,500-dollar) cultivation bill. Again the crop failed when it was washed away by too much rain.

"After that, he told us the only way to get out of this was to die. But we never took it seriously," said his brother Pralad. "He was very into his work."

Investigators for India's monopoly monitors earlier this month accused US biotech group Monsanto, which has a tight grip on the GM market, of overpricing its cotton seeds, charging so-called "technology fees" on seed packets.

Government reports had not linked its cotton seeds and the spike in the number of suicides, Monsanto said.

But activists claimed that 60 percent of farmers in Maharashtra had failed to recover costs from their first GM harvest and the seeds were totally unsuited to small-scale Indian farming.

"Monsanto should be held liable ... it's caused immense stress in the farming community," said Dr Suman Sahai, founder of the Gene Campaign, a steady critic of Monsanto.

In his report for the Maharashtra government, Srijit Mishra blamed a range of problems including falling world cotton prices, low Indian import tariffs and the failure of the state's minimum cotton price scheme.

He also said farmers, often illiterate and without proper training, were frequently dependent on seed suppliers telling them what to buy, and on unregulated moneylenders for the cash to buy it.

According to a 2003 survey, more than half of all farmers in the state were in debt and Mishra's report said about one-third of the loans came from non-official sources.

Because of the surge in suicides in the state -- from fewer than 1,100 in 1995 to more than 4,100 in 2004 -- moneylenders encourage farmers to sell them their land as security for the loan in case they commit suicide. They only sell it back if the loan is paid off, said Mishra's report.

K.S. Vatsa, rehabilitation secretary for the Maharashtra state government, said the biggest problem was the collapse of world cotton prices.

"The prices of cotton have been depressed for a long time," he said.

In Mangi village, an hour's drive from Sayatkhada, a group of 15 farmers gathered at the home of another family grieving a farmer, who killed himself three days after Gurenule.

"There could be more deaths in this village," says the dead man's father, Deorao Ragaba Shate, 75.

"If the government will not fall, then it's us who will keep falling."

Source: AFP via Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060422/bs_afp/indiaeconomyfarmsuicide_060422104621